When you are receiving feedback do you prefer someone to relay
it to you by writing or by verbal, face to face communication? I personally prefer
written feedback for the following reasons:
- Written
feedback can be delivered without emotion or tone.
- I
feel that I can reflect on the feedback with objectivity.
- Another
plus of written feedback is that you can return to it later when working
on a project. This will help you remember what it is that needed
correction or what it was that stood out in a positive way. You can
capitalize on the good and correct the bad.
- Verbal
feedback is effective only as long as the person giving feedback has the
ability to choose constructive and helpful words on the spot. When writing
you have time to evaluate what you have written to a person to determine
whether you are coming across constructive or just critical. We want to
always aim for constructive.
Creating a feedback ladder is a great way to give written
feedback or verbal feedback. When giving verbal feedback with the written
guidelines in place you avoid straying into unproductive talk. The goal of
constructive feedback is to affirm another’s work, give helpful insight that
could improve the work and to help rethink things that detract from the
work.
Verbal feedback can be useful in several ways. For example, if you do not quite understand what a person is trying to convey you can ask for clarification right then. You also have the opportunity to bounce thoughts off of one another and brainstorm new ideas for improvement.
Regardless of how you prefer feedback it is very important to be
open to ideas from others in an effort to produce a quality, final
product.
No comments:
Post a Comment